Grant's Atlas of Anatomy, 10th Edition download epub

by Anne M. R. Agur,Ming J. Lee

Anne_M._R._Agur Ming_J._Lee Medicine_and_Health_Sciences English

Epub Book: 1535 kb. | Fb2 Book: 1951 kb.

Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy. 887 Pages · 2012 · 2. 3 MB · 629 Downloads ·English. by Anne M. R. Agur & Arthur F. Dalley. Книга Atlas of Human Anatomy Atlas of Human AnatomyКниги Медицина Автор: Net. Human Anatomy: Color Atlas and Textbook.

Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy. Don't be satisfied with stories, how things have gone with others. Unfold your own myth Книга Atlas of Human Anatomy Atlas of Human AnatomyКниги Медицина Автор: Net. 81 MB·997 Downloads·Russian·New!, доступным руководством для других профессий, где анатомия являе.

Grant's atlas is aimed more at the beginning surgeon (there are much more detailed works on specific surgical anatomy) and the gross anatomy prosector, such as a first year medical student. In the anatomy laboratory, I think many students would find Grant more useful than Netter, particularly in its description of variants of normal. I believe, some unfair comparisons to Gray's Anatomy.

A cornerstone of gross anatomy since 1943, Grant's Atlas of Anatomy continues to reach students .

A cornerstone of gross anatomy since 1943, Grant's Atlas of Anatomy continues to reach students worldwide with its realistic illustrations, detailed surface anatomy photos, clinical relevance, and muscle tables.

Grant's atlas of anatomy. Agur, A. M. R; Lee, Ming J; Grant, J. C. Boileau (John Charles Boileau), 1886-1973. 10th ed. External-identifier. urn:acs6:ur:pdf:e98-a51f60fd8f0a urn:acs6:ur:epub:cbe-cca8f807f37b urn:oclc:record:1035307108. University of Toronto.

For over fifty years, Grant's Atlas of Anatomy has been the lab partner of students who appreciate fine artwork .

For over fifty years, Grant's Atlas of Anatomy has been the lab partner of students who appreciate fine artwork, realistic presentation, and concise observations.

Grant's Atlas of Anatomy (Paperback). Agur, Ming J. Lee., .

Agur and Arthur F. September 2006 · Clinical Anatomy. gold standard for human anatomical dissection.

by Anne M. Agur (Author), Ming . . This is a wonderful book replete with full color illustrations of the human anatomy. ISBN-13: 978-0781750134. Why is ISBN important? ISBN. Each section has colored tabs for ease of reference. The book has the thorax, abdomen, pelvic area, back, lower limbs, head, neck and cranial area described in detail with a cross-reference to the applicable area of the human anatomy. This work would be perfect for students of anatomy, biology, medicine and the natural sciences.

Medical Charts, Colour Atlases. Atlas anatomii Grant. ISBN13 9788391488218. Categories: Higher & Further Education, Tertiary Education. Higher & Further Education, Tertiary Education. Medical Charts, Colour Atlases.

Grant's Atlas of Anatomy : Anne . Hardcover published 1991-01-01 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Recommended in the Brandon/Hill selected list of print books and journals for the small medical library - April 2001 & 2003 For over fifty years, Grant's Atlas of Anatomy has been the lab partner of students who appreciate fine artwork, realistic presentation, and concise observations.

...features regional organization presented in a sequence based on how the reader would perform an actual laboratory dissection...with new muscle tables, larger reproductions, increased coverage of neuroanatomy, and chapter subtitles.

Comments: (7)

Kerdana

I have read the customer reviews ofGrant's Atlas and Netter's Atlas of Anatomy and have noted that the reviewers of Netter's Atlas have often denigrated Grant's Atlas. This is an improper comparison. These two atlases, although they overlap, serve, and are intended to serve, different purposes. Netter's is a general atlas, more encyclopedic in scope than Grant's. Grant's atlas is aimed more at the beginning surgeon (there are much more detailed works on specific surgical anatomy) and the gross anatomy prosector, such as a first year medical student. In the anatomy laboratory, I think many students would find Grant more useful than Netter, particularly in its description of variants of normal. There were also. I believe, some unfair comparisons to Gray's Anatomy. Gray is not primarily an atlas (although the illustrations are usually excellent). It is a texbook, and of value because of its unsurpassed descriptions of anatomy. Most of my physician colleagues have all three. These three works do not compete with, but complement one another.

Tholmeena

This is a great human anatomy atlas and I would definitely recommend this atlas to any student who is a visual learner

blodrayne

I am a student of first year MBBS.At first I found Anatomy one of the most difficult subject,but after buying Grant's Atlas of Anatomy I found It quiet simple to understand.This is an outstanding and remarkable guide to the students.Some students prefer some other Atlases e.g.Netter's etc.But I will prefer The Grant's.Infact Grant's atlas is almost more than 50 years old name and the new editions are getting best day by day along with having the previous experience....

Clonanau

This is an excellent reference book for anatomy. As a trainee physiotherapist in the seventies this book became my bible. My granddaughter is now training to become a physiotherapist and this was a gift to her to help her in her studies. I still use mine today and find it useful when dealing with treatments for my patients as they can see the area that is creating the problem. A must have book.

Voodoolkree

I am a dental student taking gross anatomy, and like some of the folks who posted reviews below, my anatomy professor listed Grant's as the text to be used for the course. Put simply, Netters is a vastly better atlas, particularly for someone who has never taken gross anatomy before.
My issues with Grant's are many, ranging from the drawings to the way the index is organized. From start to finish, the book has some serious shortcomings which create substantial inconveniences for a new anatomy student.
Many of the drawings in Grant's atlas are far more lifelike than they are explanatory. It is almost as if the illustrator's intent was to show what one would see when dissecting, rather than explain what is what and where it is. This is particularly evident when dealing with the head/neck region (which, unfortunately, is a complicated area we focus on heavily) and the routes of the cranial nerves. The small footnotes at the bottom of the pages are almost useless, as it is difficult to determine what specifically they are referring to. There are very few boldfaced references (such as those you'd see in a cell biology textbook) that allow you to quickly locate a description of the item you're trying to understand in the picture, hence, you find yourself having to read the entire thing. Netters has almost no text, yet the drawings are done in a way that clearly explain what's going on, thus no need for text.
Another serious issue with the Grant's is the index. The major entries are not in boldface text. This is such a small detail (it wouldn't have cost them a cent more to make) that makes locating things much quicker. For example, there are hundreds of items under the entry "Nerves", yet "Nerves" is not in bold-faced text. That is inexcusable, considering the fact that most of the structures we study are muscles, nerves, arteries, fascias, processes, fossas, i.e. things that must be found under major entries. Believe it or not, it makes finding a topic in the index a real hassle. There's nothing to distinguish major entries from the items found beneath them, except for the indentation.
Although some of the problems with Grant's are small, they cause problems when you have to repeatedly deal with them. Anatomy is tough enough as is without having inconveniences from your atlas. On occasion, you'll find a picture in Grant's that is more descriptive than Netter's, but rarely. In general, Grant's is a lowsy book, which should be used only as a supplement to Netters in cases where you want a more lifelike picture.

LiTTLe_NiGGa_in_THE_СribE

It is a lovely book, yes, but there were some details missing that I would have really appreciated as a new "advanced anatomy" student. For instance, adding charts so that I can be sure this vein drains to that vein when I can't be completely sure based on the illustrations. Still a great book though!

Lamranilv

Different editions offer subtle but often special differences. The illustrations alone are quite wonderful as are written descriptions.

I have a Grays Anatomy edition...this is comparable in a way I wanted. Anyone in the anatomy sciences that collect books would love to add this to their collection.

We're required to use Grant's Atlas as a first year gross anatomy atlas in med school, so I'll review it as a *medical student*. Here's my impression:

This book is fit to be used in a high-school or undergraduate anatomy course because it is not as detailed and advanced for medical students. The book skips a lot of detail, for example, it fails to show the vessels and structures inside the kidney. It does a very bad job revealing the shape of the small intestine and totally fails to show the pancreatic sphincters. And I could come up with more examples! However, the diagram quality is very good, especially for structures hard to see in real cadavers - like nerves of the brachial and lumbar plexus.

Overall, this book is good "quick reference" guide, used to locate the larger structures, as it has a very good and easy-to-use index. You may then need to refer to another atlas (like Netter's) to see greater detail.

Advice to buyers: Stay away from this book if you're in medical school or plan to attend. I don't understand why medical schools require this book. Buy it only if you're in high school or undergraduate college and on tight buget. This book is bad for medical students and good for others, so I'm giving it a 4/5.

Grant's Atlas of Anatomy, 10th Edition download epub

Medicine & Health Sciences

Author: Anne M. R. Agur,Ming J. Lee
ISBN: 0683302647
Category: Other
Subcategory: Medicine & Health Sciences
Language: English
Publisher: Williams & Wilkins; 10th edition (August 15, 1999)
Pages: 760 pages

Books similar to Grant's Atlas of Anatomy, 10th Edition: